Wednesday, January 31, 2007

France OK's Iranian Nuke Arsenal - and MUCH MORE!!!

Viva le French placation!!! Viva le French hypocrisy!!! Viva le French suicide!!! Viva le French dhimmitude!!!

Jacques Chirac Announces New French Policy:
"Iran Wants Nukes??? Let 'Em Have Nukes!!! Viva le Nukes!!!"

According to a January 31 article in The New York Times, The International Herald Tribune and Le Nouvel Observateur (h/t Drudge), French President Jacques Chirac has clarified France's thoughtful sentiment on Iran, claiming that after all the noises that he and other French diplomats have made, he doesn't have a problem with Iran having one --- or perhaps, two nuclear weapons.

But absolutely, positively, no more than that!!!
(Unless Ahmadinejad asks reeeaaallllly nicely):
“I would say that what is dangerous about this situation is not the fact of (Iran's) having a nuclear bomb,” he said. “Having one or perhaps a second bomb a little later, well, that’s not very dangerous.

"But what is very dangerous is proliferation. This means that if Iran continues in the direction it has taken and totally masters nuclear-generated electricity, the danger does not lie in the bomb it will have, and which will be of no use to it.

After Chirac essentially signed France's death warrant
(to hyena-like laughter throughout the Islamic world), and he betrayed the last vestiges of its national security policy, he went on to claim that France would avenge Israel if Iran decided to nuke it:
Mr. Chirac said it would be an act of self-destruction for Iran to use a nuclear weapon against another country. “Where will it drop it, this bomb? On Israel?” Mr. Chirac asked. “It would not have gone 200 meters into the atmosphere before Tehran would be razed.”
Then, in an exclusive inteview with JonQuixoteWorld, Chirac was asked if he would really urge limiting Iran to one or two nuclear weapons. His shocking response:
"Oh, look, who's to say. Unlike you uncultured, cowboy-fixated American swine, we sophisticated folks in France try to remain open-minded on these things. What's in a number?

"I mean, President Ahmadinejad seems to be a friendly, amiable fellow, being that he hasn't stirred up any riots in France for what... well, at least several months.

"So, what the hell - if he wants four, no - FIVE - nuclear weapons, well, what's wrong with that?
If it will make the Iranians feel like they really are part of the international community, let them have 'em. They won't use them... don't you think?"
Once clear-thinking reporters throughout the world stopped laughing at him, Chirac also made several sweeping new policy statements regarding how France will deal with murderous domestic Islamic butchers in the future:
They will be limited to only four car-burning riots throughout France each calander year. (Preferential treatment for exceeding this limit is only applicable if the cars burned were manufactured by those evil, warmongering American capitalists)

They will be limited to only one unpunished beheading per French province, per quarter.
(If they broadcast the beheading on the Internet, however, they must use unionized French TV technicians, or face fines of 10,000 Francs for each violation)

They will be limited to only four miliary-issue assault rifles per jihadist.
(Well, up to twenty, if they hire at least three unemployed French welfare statists to do odd jobs around their houses, madrassases or mosques)

They will have to pay a 50 franc fine for each bullet, RPG or missile that misses its intended target (by accident, of course), and damages any of the elaborate French government ministry buildings.

Stay tuned to JonQuixoteWorld for updates on this fascinating story of French-laced dhimmitude as it unfolds!!!

Original content is (c) Copyright 2007 by JonQuixote. All rights reserved. Email comments to


New Lawyer Group Initiates Litigation Against God re Global Warming




UPDATE, FEB. 5: See the adaptation of this blockbuster story at The People's Cube, here!!!


(DATELINE EARTH - January 31, 2007)

Occasionally, JQWorld gets a sneak peek inside those who are classified on this blog as being loonbat leftist whackjobs.

This is one of those times.

A new lawyer's group, Spiritual Lawyers Against Natural Disasters (SLAND), has been formed to initiate international class-action litigation against God for the environmental destruction and global warming that has resulted from acts that He has caused to occur.

In this exclusive interview with JonQuxiote, SLAND lead attorney and Executive Director Peacedove Handwring discloses the primary cause of global warming:

"For decades, global warming alarmists like Al Gore and others have been pointing to the manufacturing industry, human greed, the internal combustion engine and our capitalism-based society as the causes of global warming. And while these factors have all contributed to global warming, they are only incidental causes.

The real cause is far more powerful, and more difficult to deal with: God.

"Over thousands of years, God has been producing so-called 'natural disasters' that have caused many times more pollution and carbon-dioxide emissions than anything man could even conceive, yet He has been effectively absolved from any responsibility from our current plight.

"With the advent of SLAND, or 'The SLANDers,'
the free-pass afforded to God is going to come to a decisive end."
Pressed for specifics, Ms. Handwring provided some compelling examples to support her seemingly outrageous claims:

"Most people don't realize it, but May 18, 1980 was the day that produced more global-warming emissions than any single event in history. In that 24-hour period, more toxic pollutants were spewed into the Earth's biosphere than any single day, week, month or year before or since.

"And it had absolutely nothing to do with humans: it was the eruption of the volcano known as Mt. St. Helens in Washington.

"We in the rabid environmental movement had little to say about this, because most people, policy experts and scientists dismissed this as a 'natural disaster.' But who is ultimately responsible for supposedly 'natural disasters' such as this? Only one person: God.

"Furthermore, as we allege in our federal complaint, God has been singluarly responsible for the repeated ice ages that have plagued the Earth since He supposedly created it, each of which was followed by periods of global warming. We consider it eminently unfair that during these unnatural temperature cycles, so many species could not adapt and went extinct. After all --- who is He to play... God!?"

How does Ms. Handwring respond to those who might say that she, and the SLANDers, are pursuing a legal dead-end, by "suing" God? The answer is as surprising as it is revealing:

"Look, it's beyond dispute that we on the left have mastered the art of using the law, schools and public propaganda to advance anti-human, anti-industrial, anti-freedom, anti-capitalist perceptions and values. But while we have focused on factories and automobiles and the like, we've allowed God --- the most grievous violator of our right to a clean environment --- to not face the responsibility or consequences for the fact that He has been the primary cause of global warming.

"Now, look at other supposedly 'natural disasters' that also contribute more to global warming than humans ever could. Lightning strikes a forest and it goes up in flames, belching clouds of toxic materials into the atmosphere. Until now, we chalked it up to a 'random occurrence.' But who is really responsible? That's right --- God.

"We at SLAND are now going to marshal and focus our legal skills, and all the resources at our avail, to expose this travesty, and to finally hold God accountable, both in a court of law, and in the so-called 'court of public opinion.' Then, and only then, will we be able to finally deal with the real cause of so many needless deaths of humans, animals and plants."
The first stage of SLAND's campaign will be massive public demonstrations by the most notorious enviro-activists who have protested in various venues throughout the world, over the past 40 years.

JQWorld has obtained these exclusive photos from Ms. Handwring, as a preview of what may be coming to a park, shopping mall or public school near you:

Anonymous members of the newly-forming "SLANDers Loonbat Protest Brigade"

As of JQWorld press time, God was unavailable for comment. One of God's spokesmen, St. Ernest, however, issued the following statement:

"While God certainly respects Ms. Handwring and her fellow attorneys at SLAND, He is a bit busy right now trying to deal with the insanity of religious wars occurring throughout the world to respond to her accusations as fully as he'd like. We are, however, in receipt of the SLANDers' discovery motions, and will be responding to them at our earliest opportunity.

"And although we aren't sure which court would have jurisdiction in such a cosmic matter, God is eagerly looking forward to defending both Himself and human freedom against SLANDers' allegations."

Stay tuned to JQWorld for the latest developments as this fascinating super-nature-al legal drama unfolds!!!

Original content is (c) Copyright 2007 by JonQuixote. All rights reserved. Email comments to


Tuesday, January 30, 2007

News from... Europistan?


We've seen it coming for a while.

But the mainstream media's obsession with the 2008 election derby, the latest contestants from "American Idol," and presenting a daily pictorial of carnage from Iraq has prevented them from even broaching this subject.

Now, noted historian Bernard Lewis is, to his satisfaction, confirming it:

Muslims 'About To Take Over Europe'
The Jerusalem Post - January 29, 2007

Islam could soon be the dominant force in a Europe which, in the name of political correctness, has abdicated the battle for cultural and religious control, Prof. Bernard Lewis, the world-renowned Middle Eastern and Islamic scholar, said on Sunday.

The Muslims "seem to be about to take over Europe," Lewis said at a special briefing with the editorial staff of The Jerusalem Post.

Asked what this meant for the continent's Jews, he responded, "The outlook for the Jewish communities of Europe is dim." Soon, he warned, the only pertinent question regarding Europe's future would be, "Will it be an Islamized Europe or Europeanized Islam?" The growing sway of Islam in Europe was of particular concern given the rising support within the Islamic world for extremist and terrorist movements, said Lewis.

Lewis, whose numerous books include the recent What Went Wrong?: The Clash Between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East, and The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror, would set no timetable for this drastic shift in Europe, instead focusing on the process, which he said would be assisted by "immigration and democracy."

Instead of fighting the threat, he elaborated, Europeans had given up.

"Europeans are losing their own loyalties and their own self-confidence," he said. "They have no respect for their own culture." Europeans had "surrendered" on every issue with regard to Islam in a mood of "self-abasement," "political correctness" and "multi-culturalism," said Lewis, who was born in London to middle-class Jewish parents but has long lived in the United States.

The threat of extremist Islam goes far beyond Europe, Lewis stressed, turning to the potential impact of Iran going nuclear under its current regime.

The Cold War philosophy of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), which prevented the former Soviet Union and the United States from using the nuclear weapons they had targeted at each other, would not apply to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Iran, said Lewis.

"For him, Mutual Assured Destruction is not a deterrent, it is an inducement," said Lewis of Ahmadinejad. "We know already that they [Iran's ruling ayatollahs] do not give a damn about killing their own people in great numbers. We have seen it again and again. If they kill large numbers of their own people, they are doing them a favor. They are giving them a quick, free pass to heaven. I find all that very alarming," said Lewis.


Read the rest
here --- soon.

Then, review
this blogpost at JQWorld from a few weeks ago, to correlate this information to what's happening in London(istan).

Then, consider all the typical bromides you've been hearing lately about how America needs to make special concessions to Muslims, so as to be "tolerant" and "inclusive" and "diverse" --- and where this all is leading us.

Finally, consider where we're headed with loonbats like John Conyers, the newly-appointed head of the House Judiciary Committee, who has said repeatedly that he intends to outlaw "racial profiling," particularly as it relates to Muslims.

Ayn Rand commented that humans are the only species that can commit suicide.

If this isn't it, then I don't know what would be.


UPDATE: January 30

From LGF: UK Prison Toilets Now Shari'a-Compliant

Toilets in one London prison are getting a face-lift — or rather, a change in direction — to accommodate Muslim inmates who can’t use them while facing Mecca, a British newspaper reported.

Government officials ackowledged using tax dollars for the changes to the facilities, but maintained that moving the toilets was part of “on-going refurbishment,” according to an article in The Sun.
And to think we were once related to the British.

Read the rest here. Just make sure you're facing Constitution Hall in Philadelphia while you're doing so, to prevent your immediate transformation into a dhimmi.


Saturday, January 27, 2007

The Hidden Truth Behind The "Peace Marchers"


With the vast resources of America's mainstream media, and its unrelenting investigations to expose the supposed "truth" behind innumerable scandals (real or fictitious), it's worth noting the hurricane-sized omission that the MSM is now, and has been refusing to address, regarding the real makeup of the organizers behind the "peace marches" that today descended on Washington, D.C.

The main organizer of these marches is "United For Peace & Justice." Gosh, who could possibly question or be against an organization with a name like that? Well, that's about as far as the mainsteam media will go; it sounds good, it sounds patriotic, it sounds benevolent, so, well, let's not look any further.

The reality is that U&J is not what it appears --- and until the MSM pulls its fingers out of its ears, 99.9% of Americans will not know "the truth" behind its benevolent-sounding facade.

On its main web page,
UP&J describes itself as:

"(A) coalition of more than 1300 local and national groups throughout the United States who have joined together to protest the immoral and disastrous Iraq War and oppose our government's policy of permanent warfare and empire-building."

Hm. Well. OK, dissent can be patriotic. But who are those 1,300 groups? Well, on the
Member Groups Directory link, some of them are identified:

"American Friends Service Committee, Black Radical Congress, Center for Constitutional Rights, CODEPINK, Friends of the Earth, Global Exchange, Gold Star Families for Peace, Green Party of the United States, Greenpeace, Iraq Veterans Against the War, Military Families Speak Out, National Organization for Women, National Youth and Student Peace Coalition, Not in Our Name, PAX Christi USA, RainbowPUSH Coalition, September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, TrueMajority, US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, US Labor Against the War, Veterans for Peace, Vietnam Veterans Against the War, and War Resisters League"

Wow, now that sounds like a pretty non-descript, benevolent group of folks, doesn't it? (Well, those who are familiar with many of these groups know them to be fronts for fundamentally anti-American organizations --- but we'll discuss that later)

But gee... what happens when you follow the link that says "Complete List"? Holy samolians, it takes you to
a directory of "member organizations" that is quite a bit more descriptive than what was alluded to before... including the following (with their mission statements/descriptors in "links"):

Commitees of Correspondence for Democracy & Socialism (link)

Communist Party USA (

Democratic Socialists of America (

Freedom Road Socialist Organization (

Freedom Socialist Party (

International Socialist Organization (

Socialist Alternative (

Socialist Party USA (

Young Communist League (

Young Democratic Socialists of America (

Gosh, that's a lot of socialists and communists, eh?

Wonder why those names aren't listed on UP&J's main pages, or on their flyers, or posters, or placards?
Maybe because these groups' history of subversion of American principles, as documented here, and elsewhere, doesn't exactly play well with the ordinary thinking Americans who watch the nightly news?

(And that's not even mentioning the other organizations on this list, like CodePink, the Progressive Democrats of America and others, whose stated missions and ideals are practically indistinguishable from those of socialists and communists. For detailed information on these and other organizations that fomented and participated in this march and others like it, see links here, here, here and here)

Given the ease with which a 4-year-old on a computer could find the UP&J directory of the explicitly-named socialist and communist organizations that are the real driving forces behind the "peace marches" --- and which, according to their explicit statements, seek nothing less than a complete subversion of the U.S. Constitution, and its principles of individual liberty, property rights and strictly limited governmental powers --- one might wonder, when will the MSM get its head out of its collective ass, and expose this vital fact?

Can you imagine what would happen if a group of non-leftists organized for a protest, and right there on the Web was easily-accessible information that it was aligned with groups that championed ideologies that were responsible for an estimated 100 million deaths in the 20th century --- like socialism, communism and their variants were (link, link, link)? Or which were affiliated with neo-Nazis, white supremacists, or other racists?

The MSM would be on the organizing group and its cheerleaders like bourbon stains on Teddy Kennedy's tie at an open bar, and would not relent until they'd exposed this fact to the world, 24/7, for days on end.

Why does the MSM not focus its critical eye, and its enormous resources, on exposing UP&J's real alliances, and their missions and ideals?

This is a question worth asking.

And functional, patriotic
(non-communist/socialist) minds want to know.

What say you, mainstream media? Will you expose these facts?

Original content is (c) Copyright 2007 by JonQuixote. All rights reserved. Email comments to


Thursday, January 25, 2007

Jack Bauer Interrogates The MSM Re: Obama-Mania!!!


This morning (January 24, 2007), I woke up laughing, because my awakening occurred amidst a dream that was so outlandish, yet so timely and relevant, that I could not help but laugh. The dream related to the way that the mainstream media launched Barack Obama into the forefront of the 2008 presidential race, because... well, no one seems to have any idea.

But one man... a (fictitous) American hero --- JACK BAUER --- became determined to find out... in his own, inimitable style.

The Setting:
A sneering Jack Bauer, standing in the center of a circle of chairs, in a darkened room, with a lone bright light above his head. In each of the chairs, securely restrained by Jack-tied ropes, is
a prominent figure in the mainstream media, including:
Katie Couric, Brian Williams, Charles Gibson, David Gregory, Wolf Blitzer, Diane Sawyer, Joe Klein, Robert Stengel (Managing Editor - TIME), and Richard Smith (Editor-In-Chief - Newsweek).
In other words, the first-string team of MSM figures who dish out the same left-tilting bromides and interpretations of the news, day after day, via their respective outlets.


JACK: Now listen, all of you, and listen good. One way or another, you’re going to tell me why you all created "Obama-Mania." We can do this the easy way or the hard way. And if you’ve watched even a few episodes of “24,” trust me, you want the easy way.

Katie Couric: Oh, don’t be such a tough-guy. We don’t have to tell you Jack shi…

JACK (bends over and gets right in her face): Lady, you’re going to tell me what I want to know or so help me, your “perkiness” will be nothing but a horrific memory to America .

Brian Williams:
Easy there, Mr. Bauer, sir… she’s just a news anchor. We don’t have as much power as you think…

JACK (with hand now around front of Williams’ neck): Yes, you do. Every evening, tens of millions of Americans tune into your broadcasts. They trust you to report the news – NOT to MAKE the news. Barack Hussein Obama came out of nowhere, and over the past few months, you and your little friends here have made him the #1 contender for the 2008 Democratic nomination, before he even announced his candidacy. I want to know WHY – and you’re going to tell me, one way or another.

Charles Gibson: Um, Mr. Bauer, sir, there’s no need to get violent. We can all get along, can’t we?

JACK: Sure, sure we can. As soon as you all start talking, and explaining this exorbitant pre-campaign coverage you gave Obama, we’ll get along just like old friends.

Diane Sawyer: This is ridiculous!!! We are all independent journalists, and we don’t have to tell you or anyone else why we do the things we do!!! We respond to what our viewers and readers are interested in, and then we…

JACK (putting his finger to his lips…): Lady, you don’t have a CLUE what people are interested in. You and your little pals have been MAKING the news, and most recently, you and your friends have MADE Obama into a superstar. I’m going to find out why – and you are going to help me. Or we’re going to have a problem, and trust me, you don’t want me as your problem.

Joe Klein: Now see here – there’s a thing called freedom of speech in America, and just because I wrote the cover story for TIME about how Obama should… er, I mean, could, be our next president, doesn't give you the right to...

JACK (clamps hand over Klein’s mouth): Yes, there is freedom of speech – and I’m exercising mine, now, at your expense. TALK!!! Why did you create Obama-Mania!?

Katie Couric: OK!!! OK!!! I’ll tell you!!!

Brian Williams: NO!!! You don’t have to tell him a thi…

JACK (looks at Williams, who immediately shuts up; then, to Katie): Go on.

Katie: OK, OK, just calm down!!! It’s because he’s like a walking one-man United Nations. He’s half-black and half-white, he was born a Muslim but converted to Christianity, he claims to be for freedom but advocates policies that are rooted in Marxism. He’s an undercover socialist, which is exactly what America needs right now. All that, plus, he’s G-O-Rgeous…

Robert Stengel: We put him on the cover of TIME Magazine and claimed he’d be a good president because he can speak clearly, he has a penetrating look, and he agrees with all of our leftist ideologies. And even though he said he wasn’t in the race, we felt maybe we could convince him to join it, by giving him a free PR machine that would have cost tens of millions of dollars, that other candidates will have to spend.

JACK: Particularly non-leftists, right?

Joe Klein: Well, right.

Robert Stengel:
Joe, shut up!!!

Joe Klein: No, YOU shut up!!!

Diane Sawyer: Both of you shut up!!!

JACK: ALL of you shut up!!! And none of you see anything wrong with doing this?

Wolf Blitzer: No, why should we? We can do whatever we damn well pl…

JACK: Not without consequences, you can’t, you pompous jackass.

Wolf Blitzer: So what if we did it? You, you big man, your days are OVER. What we need is to rebuild America ’s place in the world from what all you warmongers did to it!!! Violence isn’t the solution to every problem!!! Do you know that????

JACK (bends down, goes literally nose-to-nose with him, shouting): America ’s PLACE in the world!?!? As if you had nothing to do with it??? EVERY day and every night, running the worst possible portrayals of what the U.S. is doing in Afghanistan , Iraq and other hot spots!?? REFUSING to cover the progress we are making!?!? The fact that our military has not lost a single battle??? Running the pictures of the real and fabricated deviant activities at Abu Grhaib and Guantanamo for months on end, without giving a thousandth of the time and print space to the measures we’ve gone to, to correct those situations? To punish the offenders? Without telling how we feed detainees gourmet Islamic meals, give them more luxuries and freedoms than prisoners anywhere in the world? These murderers!?!?

And what do you do?!? You portray them as victims, little innocent lambs caught up by the brutal Americans!?!?!?! And THEN, you have the AUDACITY to go take surveys of your readers and viewers to see what they “THINK” of our efforts in the war against Islamic fascism!?? And you claim you have NOTHING to do with how America is perceived in the world!!?!?

You have CREATED that impression, and have reinforced it 24/7 for months and years on end, you lowlife maggot!!! Er, excuse me... (sarcastically)... "Wolf" (snickers).

And I KNOW something about the 24-hour cycle, if you know what I mean.

Brian Williams: Look, Mr. Bauer, sir, if you could just loosen these straps…

JACK: No, I can’t. Not until you finish. How long did you think you could get away with all this?

Brian Williams: We didn’t know. In the news business, once one of us starts something, it kind of snowballs and the rest of us pick up on it, until Americans are overdosed on the story. Then we play it some more, until we can create or find a new “mania” to cover. We need eyeballs, Mr. Bauer, it’s as simple as that.

JACK (sarcastically): Oh really, as simple as that. Well if that were true, then why didn’t you focus all that airtime, and all that ink, on any other presidential hopeful? Why wasn’t this “Guiliani-Mania?” Or “Tancredo-Mania?” Or what about "Paul-Mania" --- you know, Ron Paul, the first Congressional libertarian in memory to run??? Why “Obama-Mania?”

David Gregory: Now look here, Jack…

JACK (gets in his face): That’s “Mr. Bauer” to you, scumbag.

David Gregory: Ahem, Mr. Bauer, sir… I think you already know the answer to that. It’s because Obama is a leftist, and those other guys you suggested, well, aren’t. And Tancredo, eewwww… he’s for a strong border, strong national defense, against illegal immigration, etc.

If we’re going to rebuild our popularity in the world, we have a lot to atone for, and a good place to start is by not being so terribly selfish. We have more than we need, and there are so many who have so little. We need to be more generous, so people will finally start to like us again. And Obama is for open immigration, shares Ted Kennedy’s desire to let all the illegals here become citizens (Democrats), is not going to offend Muslims by going after terrorists and terror cells, and is for all sorts of other welfare-state giveaways.

JACK: So that’s it. You all basically picked Obama out of the crowd, and made him your undisputed favorite for months on end, building his candidacy, wall-to-wall coverage, all because he’s of mixed racial and religious heritage, speaks well, and is handsome. Oh, and because he’s sympathetic to leftist causes. Is that it? Do I have that correct?

Katie Couric: Yes!!! That’s it!!! So what are you going to do about it, big man??? We can do WHAT we want!!! We are the ELITES of journalism!!! And just WAIT until my lawyer finds out that you’ve tied me up to this…

JACK: Lady, I didn’t get the nasty reputation I have for nothing. I could beat you to death with your own perfumed fist and there isn’t a man or woman in this room who’d testify that I did it, or that I was even here. They know it, I know it, and you do too. So shut the hell up until I ask you a question.

Charles Gibson: OK, now that you’ve found us out, what are you going to do?

JACK: That’s the first intelligent thing any of you have asked. And the answer is…


And that is where the dream ended.

But as we all saw on Monday what Jack is willing to do to his own brother to get information...

... who knows what Jack would do to get the MSM to be more fair, more balanced, and to not pick and choose who should be at the top of the presidential derby ticket???

Stay tuned... I'll see if, via biofeedback and bedtime reminders, I can get back into the groove of this dream, and learn the rest of this tale.




Fresh on the heels of "Jack Bauer Interrogates The MSM..." comes this story from ABC:

Hillary's Hollywood Friends Switch Sides: Steven Spielberg and David Geffen Invite Hundreds of Stars to Their Big Barack Obama Fundraiser


"Movie moguls Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg want their Hollywood peers to join them at a Feb. 20 fundraiser the three are throwing for Obama. For $2,300 a person and $4600 a couple, they can meet the candidate at a reception at the Beverly Hilton Hotel, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. Those who commit to raising $46,000 (10 couples/20 tickets) for the evening will be invited to a private dinner at Geffen's Malibu, Calif., home. The fundraiser represents a major slap for Obama's main competitor, Sen. Hillary Clinton, who has received financial support from all three moguls in the past. Their company, Dreamworks SKG, has contributed $47,000 to Clinton since her 2000 New York Senate campaign."

Word to the wise: Keep a sharp lookout for new, intensive IRS audits of Spielberg, Geffen and Dreamworks, courtesy of the same vindictive couple that brought America the "Bimbo Eruption Squad," the 1,000 secret FBI files on political opponents ("an innocent mistake"), and other forms of retaliation against anyone who dares to cross them...


(Little Feb. 10 update: Apparently Steven Spielberg already got the "message" from the HillaryCorps - read



As documented by

GMA: The Beatification of Barack Obama


"Is the man running to be president . . . or Saint Barack of Chicago? Hard to tell after GMA's hagiography this morning. The segment was a run-up to Obama's planned announcement tomorrow of his presidential intentions. Obama's own advertising consultants might have balked at the presentation as too over-the-top in its worshipful tone and substance.

Here's what we got: Robin Roberts introduced the segment by saying that while Barack is a presidential front-runner, 'he may also be the least well known.' Was that Robin's way of disputing Hillary's claim to being 'the most famous person you don't know'? Claire Shipman narrated the segment and began by describing Obama as 'calm and charismatic'."
"While the segment's purported purpose was to tell us about 'the least known candidate', note that it was entirely content-free when it came to Obama's political views. That would have required letting us know that Obama is a doctrinaire liberal with ratings to the left of Hillary, and might have spoiled the saint-of-all-the-people image ABC was working so assiduously to portray."

[Note: See here for validation of the above contention]

Read at all here.

Obama couldn't be doing better if he had George (Mr. "De-Nazify America") Soros as his financial sugar daddy. Er, wait... he already DOES.

Gee --- I can't wait until the MSM begins to disclose all this...







Well... now David Geffen and about 600 of his Hollywood know-it-all leftist pals have been placed on the "Hillary-Revenge Watch List."

For to "betray" Hillary is to invite all the retribution that the Clintons can muster, as was witnessed throughout the 1980s and 1990s. And new IRS audits of their mega-million $ lifestyles should be the least of Geffen & Co.'s worries.

Geffen Acknowledges Clintons Are Congenital Liars
Feburary 21, 2007 --- Editor & Publisher

Wow... who'd have thought that David Geffen is a masochist!? Excerpt:

Maureen Dowd's column in The New York Times today, in which she quoted former Bill Clinton supporter David Geffen offering a few caustic comments, has
incited a strong Hillary Clinton campaign attack on Geffen -- and the candidate
he now favors, Sen. Barack Obama. Then Obama's team fired back.

"Everybody in politics lies, but they [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it’s troubling,” Geffen had said.

Clinton campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson released the following statement this morning: "While Senator Obama was denouncing slash and burn politics yesterday, his campaign's finance chair was viciously and personally attacking Senator Clinton and her husband."If Senator Obama is indeed sincere about his repeated claims to change the tone of our politics, he should immediately denounce these remarks, remove Mr. Geffen from his campaign and return his money.

Whoa. Sounds like war to me. If only the Clintonistas' "two-for-the-price-of-one" co-presidency were as effective at waging war against jihadist murderers as they are at waging war against anyone who questions or opposes them politically --- instead of emboldening them through half-actions, no-actions and stunning negligence ---, maybe we wouldn't have faced a 9/11.

Awaiting new reports on whether or not Hillary will "vote" to launch an all-out assault by her "enforcers" on the Geffen brigade, then disavow it as "an honest mistake."

As if this weren't enough... read on:

Hillary Furious at Hollywood
Feburary 21, 2007 ---

Hillary Clinton was reportedly "furious” at the three Hollywood moguls and Clinton "friends” who hosted Tuesday night’s fund-raiser for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. Three of the entertainment industry’s biggest names – DreamWorks studio founders Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen – hosted the private Beverly Hills fund-raiser for Sen. Obama, and checks from Hollywood’s A-list of stars – including George Clooney, Eddie Murphy and Barbra Streisand – added up to a one-night take of $1 million.

The New York Post, quoting a source, said Sen. Clinton "was furious at the three, who she thought were her friends, for supporting her rival. The source said that someone in Clinton’s office even called Geffen.

"They were very angry [the moguls] were holding this event. They calmed down after an assurance was made that there would still be support and money left over for [Clinton].”...

When asked if Obama can stand up to "Clinton Inc.," Geffen replied: "I hope so, because that machine is going to be very unpleasant and unattractive and effective."

Wow. Given the Clintonistas' long record of retaliation against anyone who exposes or challenges their nefarious dealings, or their congenital character flaws, I'd say there are about 600 Hollywood bigshots who had better be watching over their shoulders... because the Clintons and their enforcers are now most definitely on the warpath.



Well, one might think this could be an April Fool's joke - but apparently this is no joke. The School of the Art Institute of Chicago has on display a statue depicting Barack Hussein Obama as the Christian savior. Read and see the story here.

Original content is (c) Copyright 2007 by JonQuixote. All rights reserved. Email comments to


Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Combating HuffPost Hate & Hysteria - The Continuing Saga


Although I've not spent much time at lately, due to a combination of factors --- including my lack of interest, and the fact that I and other dissenters have been repeatedly "banned" since mid-December --- today was an exception.

I received an email heads-up from a friend who alerted me of the almost unprecedented level of hysteria and hate that was being expressed on a particular thread, which claims that according to a recent survey, "most of the world" disapproves of America, and its work in Iraq, in particular:

Excerpt from the BBC article at the root of this thread:

"The view of the US's role in the world has deteriorated both internationally and domestically, a BBC poll suggests. The World Service survey, conducted in 25 nations including the US, found that three in four respondents disapproved of how Washington had dealt with Iraq. The majority of the 26,381 respondents also disapproved of the way five other foreign policy areas had been handled."

And here are some of the posts that the "peace" and "tolerance" and "inclusive" and "diversity" crowd put up on the thread (which, as noted at JonQuixoteWorld repeatedly, wouldn't be complete without scorching diatribes against Jews, Israel and AIPAC):

The Bush/Cheney administration - arrogant, out-of-touch and dangerously out-of-control!WRITE YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS AND DEMAND THEIR RESIGNATIONS! DO IT NOW!Before y'all take another fucking pill.
By: getoffmedz on January 22, 2007 at 08:22pm

Bush to world: "I CAN'T HEAR YOU I CAN'T HEAR YOU I CAN'T HEAR YOU, LA LA LA LA LA LA "He doesn't care what anyone thinks, because he doesn't value thought!Well, Mr. Bush, FUCK YOU! I hope your secret service detail looks the other way...PEACE
By: braindeadsorry on January 22, 2007 at 08:30pm

Great -- everybody f'ing hates us! For next year's survey can we inform the respondents that that we don't actually run our own foreign policy. We have outsourced that to foreign Israeli lobbyists like AIPAC and AEI and Israeli generals who use our kids' lives and our nations' treasure for their own benefit. I bet you then they survey would show overwhelming compassion for the United States of Occupied Israeli Territories.
By: notafraidofneocons on January 22, 2007 at 09:14pm

Zionists and torture in Iraq (from GITMO to Abu Ghraib):
By: SAVEAMERICAFROMAIPACNOW on January 22, 2007 at 09:21pm

We used to love America, today we wouldn't shed a single tear if fascist ameriKKKa was vaporized once and for all.You use all the energy, make all the pollution, create all the problems (along with your zionist puppetteer), manipuilate markets, rig elections everywhere, you are the torturers, the Geneva Convention violators, the real false flag black ops terrorists, etc, etc...Actually, the world would have the biggest joy and relief explosion ever if you just went away and died!Perhaps soon, everybody everywhere will try to take shots at you no matter where you go on vacations... you can be thankful the rest of the world is not as gun crazed as the uSSa or many of you "american tourister" would be cheneyed at every chance and street corner!Perhaps soon!FUCK AMERICA, KILL AND CURSE ALL OF YOU NAZI MOTHERFUCKERS!
By: europe on January 22, 2007 at 11:00pm

Impeaching Bush and Cheney isn't enough. They should be put on trial and executed in public and in great shame. In fact, the people of the world should participate in this because Bush and Cheney have inflicted so much pain and suffering on millions in this world, directly or indirectly.
By: thehealer on January 22, 2007 at 11:24pm

By: gopnot on January 23, 2007 at 12:06am

Today America is nothing more than a giant corporation. It is run like a corporation and it smells like a corporation. And BushCo has managed to fumigate the entire nation with poisons from the Neo-con doctrine through their propaganda machine, Fox News. This has cultivated a society that is filled with brainless humans programmed to be slaves to corporate America. Lazy, stupid, and incompetent Americans are promoted and praised while the hard-working and honest folks get stepped on and tossed out.This is America today. An America that is run by the evil of corporate America. From pharmaceutical to weapon industry, the every evil of exterme capitalism characterized by greed has permeated deep inside the American culture, one that believes other nations' resources belong to America: "what yours is mine and what mine is mine".It's only a matter of time that the US will implode upon the gravity of greed and evil vigorously flowing through the veins of corporate America. Don't ever think for a minute that America will be destroyed from without. Self-destruction will most likely be the case for a short-live empire, the USofA.
By: thehealer on January 23, 2007 at 12:13am

Soon there will no longer be an America (nor israel)... and, as they have finally both revealed themselves for the monsters they really are... I, for one, say GOOD RIDDANCE ! History is being written on the walls these nazis erect...Halleluia... the age of Aquarius... of rebirth... but before that, much suffering, much evil, American and Jewish evil.But that too shall pass...
By: europe on January 23, 2007 at 12:50am

5-The media, heavy with AIPAC and other fanatic jewish group members and shills, ignores what is going on in Gaza, as the Israelis continue war crimes against a civilian population, like Israeli soldiers shooting Palestinian children in fields and riding bikes...and more!!... Isn't this a bitch?The 2 nations that make war,threaten everyone at the drop of a hat, are Israel and the U.S.
By: FayezHamda on January 23, 2007 at 02:47am

Dear World:On behalf of the better 49% of Americans (now up to around 65%) we are still sooooo fucking sorry.
By: neocommie on January 23, 2007 at 04:02am

It should be clear to all but the hopelessly stupid and partisan, that our presence on the Middle East is not and never has been to make it and the world a safer placeWe are there for resources and because Israel requires it--the master plan is all out war and then a new world order--fascism and slavery for all of us, courtesy of the elite
By: PeteChrisman on January 23, 2007 at 09:42am

Get Barney to bite off Bush's penis and then let him and his doggie friends play it while the prez is forced to watch! Now doesn't that sound the perfect punishment for this man's crimes?
By: TLV on January 23, 2007 at 10:04am

And that's just a sampling.


Here was my response to this internationalist lunacy, and the UN-worshipping, America-bashing diatribes:

Europe and Asia have been responsible for more than 100 million deaths in the 20th century, whereas the United States has been responsible for liberating and extending the lives of more people than any nation in history.

For decades, Eurotrash weenies have had the chance to deal with the hotspots in their backyards (when they weren't arming and supporting thugs, dictators, etc.), and they punted (if not endorsing these miscreants to positions on the UN "Human Rights Commission."

And it's been America, time and time and time again, that has gone in, alone or with friends, to take care of business.

And it's precisely for this reason that we are so resented - because we finally realized that with or without Eurotrash allies and Asian weasels, we had to go take care of business, again.

It's kind of like a gang of unruly kids who resent the one parent in the neighborhood who actually enforces the rules and protects them from themselves, and those they've surrendered to. Look at France - they can't even muster the backbone to deal with legions of 15 year old punk jihadists, who are overwhelming their police forces. They propose to tell us how to deal with rogue nations (who they've helped to arm, and who they sold their votes in the UN to protect, in exchange for oil subsidies)? The French have nothing to teach us except appeasement and self-destruction, as they are now surrendering their entire culture to jihadists. England is well on its way to following France's lead:

Sure, it's nice to be "supported" by supposed "friends," but there are precious few around.

And that's the crux of why this "poll" is meaningless. We don't have to ask for permission from anyone - let alone the body of miscreants, pimps, murderers and tyrants that comprise the UN - to enforce UN resolutions, and that which is in our security interest.

International poll? Screw 'em..

By: JQ4U2(*) on January 23, 2007 at 10:55am
*This is my 16th new login ID since mid-December, because as I said earlier, "JonQuixote" and 15 subsequent IDs had been repeatedly banned by HuffingtonPost.

You can guess the reaction to this post. Go here, and to subsequent pages to see it for yourself.


A February 2006 essay by the fabulous Mark Steyn sums up this lunacy even better than I have. Excerpts:

Transnationalism is the mechanism by which the world’s most enlightened progressives provide cover for its darkest forces. It’s a largely unconscious alliance, but not an illogical one. Western proponents of Kyoto and some of the other loopy NGO-beloved eco-doom-mongering concepts up for debate in Montreal at the moment have at least this much in common with psychotic Third World thugocracies: they find it hard to win free elections, they regard transnational bodies as useful for conferring a respect unearned at the ballot box, and they are unduly troubled by the lack of accountability in global institutions...

...(T)he UN is a shamefully squalid organization whose corruption is almost impossible to exaggerate. If you think—as the media and the left do in this country—that Iraq is a God-awful mess (which it’s not), then try being the Balkans or Sudan or even Cyprus or anywhere where the problem’s been left to the United Nations. If you don’t want to bulk up your pension by skimming the Oil-for-Food program, no need to worry. Whatever your bag, the UN can find somewhere that suits—in West Africa, it’s Sex-for-Food, with aid workers demanding sexual services from locals as young as four; in Cambodia, it’s drug dealing; in Kenya, it’s the refugee extortion racket; in the Balkans, sex slaves. On a UN peace mission, everyone gets his piece...

... (W)hat should replace the UN? Some people talk about a “caucus of the democracies.” But I’d like to propose a more radical suggestion: nothing. In the war on terror, America’s most important relationships have been not transnational but bilateral: Australia’s John Howard didn’t dispatch troops to Iraq because the Aussies and the Yanks belong to the same international talking shop; Tony Blair’s reliability on war and terror isn’t because of the European Union but in spite of it. These relationships are meaningful precisely because they’re not the product of formal transnational bureaucracies.

... (W)hen the tsunami hit last year, hundreds of thousands of people died within minutes. The Australians and Americans arrived within hours. The UN was unable to get to Banda Aceh for weeks. Instead, the humanitarian fat cats were back in New York and Geneva holding press conferences warning about post-tsunami health consequences—dysentery, cholera, BSE from water-logged cattle, etc.—that, its spokesmen assured us, would kill as many people as the original disaster. But this never happened, any more than did their predictions of disaster for Iraq: “The head of the World Food Program has warned that Iraq could spiral into a massive humanitarian disaster.” Or for Afghanistan: “The UN Children’s Fund has estimated that as many as 100,000 Afghan children could die of cold, disease and hunger.”

... (I)t’s one thing to invent humanitarian disasters to disparage Bush’s unilateralist warmongering; but in the wake of the tsunami, the UN was reduced to inventing a humanitarian disaster in order to distract attention from the existing humanitarian disaster it wasn’t doing anything about.

... (W)hile the UN and its agencies were on television badgering and hectoring the West for its stinginess, the actual relief efforts were being made by a couple of diverted U.S. naval groups and the Royal Australian Navy. The Scandinavians can’t fly in relief supplies, because they don’t have any C-130s. All they can do is wait for the UN to swing by and pick up their check. And it says something for the post-modern decadence of the age that that gives you supposed moral superiority.

It’s a good basic axiom that if you take a quart of ice cream and a quart of dog mess and mix ’em together, the result will taste more like dog mess than ice cream. That’s the problem with the UN. If you make the free nations and the thug states members of the same club, the danger isn’t that they’ll meet each other half-way but that the free world winds up going three-quarters or seven-eighths of the way. Indeed, the UN has met the thug states so much more than half way that they now largely share the dictators’ view of their peoples—as either helpless children who need every decision made for them, or a bunch of dupes whose national wealth can be rerouted to a Swiss bank account. Perhaps that malign combination of empty European gesture-politics and Third World larceny would be relatively harmless, at least in the geopolitical sense, if these were quieter times. But they’re not.

... (T)his is an age in which America and its real allies—a bigger number than you’d think—need to be free to act without being a latter-day Gulliver ensnared by Lilliputian UN resolutions from head to toe. After all, consider the alternative to American action. As you may have noticed, the good people of Darfur in Sudan have been fortunate enough not to attract the attention of the arrogant cowboy unilateralist Bush and have instead fallen under the care of the UN multilateral compassion set. So, after months of expressing deep, grave concern over whether the graves were deep enough, Kofi Annan managed to persuade the UN to set up a committee to look into what’s going on in Darfur. Eventually, they reported back that it’s not genocide.

... (T)he transnational establishment’s alternative to Bush and his “coalition of the willing”: appoint a committee that agrees on the urgent need to do nothing at all. Thus, last year the UN Human Rights Commission announced the working group that will decide which complaints will be heard at its annual meeting in Geneva this spring: the five-nation panel that will select which human-rights violations will be up for discussion comprises the Netherlands, Hungary, Cuba, Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe. I wouldn’t bet on them finding room on their crowded agenda for the question of human rights in Cuba, Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe.

Read it all here. Also, check out Mark Steyn's fantastic speech recently at The Heritage Foundation, here.

But leave it to the mainstream media, America's government-strangled school system, and Eurorash-worshipping, UN-idealizing blogsites like to continue to foment hatred of America, of its motivations and actions, and of our underlying principles --- particularly the right of self-defense and the rule of law.

International polls be damned: There may be some merit in some of their criticisms, but we also need to consider the sources: the hundreds of millions of "world citizens" who believe it is their duty to live under the most corrupt, oppressive, murderous regimes --- or those "cultured" nations" who look the other way or worse, enable or even justify these regimes --- many of whom participated in this trumpeted "poll."

Ayn Rand described this phenomenon best: "The hatred of the good for being good."

If America didn't exist, or was removed from the planet, the status quo of oppression, murder and surrender to religious or statist tyrants would be so much simpler. There would be no "shining city on a hill" to stand in stark contrast.

America doesn't exist to make things simpler for freedom-haters, liberty-bashers, and those who refuse to act in their self-defense.

America exists for its own sake.

And this, combined with the fact that we have made more progress in terms of advancing and defending freedom and human life in the course of our relatively short existence than any other nation in history, is what they really resent.

International polls --- with these subjects as the body of those being polled?

I say again: Screw 'em.