Only in this case, he's speaking not only to his jihadist followers, but directly to the Democrats in America (source: CNN):
"Bush is... addicted to drinking, lying and gambling... and the American people are the ones who chose him twice, out of greed for the Muslims' treasures and in animosity to them."Gosh. After all that al Quada and their jihadist bretheren invested in a Democratic Party win in November (to be documented in a post in the very near future), they sure seem pretty pissed off now, eh?
"The people chose you due to your opposition to Bush's policy in Iraq, but it appears that you are marching with him to the same abyss, and it appears that you will take part with him in the defeat and certain failure, with God's permission. And the American people shall discover that you are all one side of the same coin of tyranny, criminality and failure..."
But I don't understand why al Zawahiri is so pissed --- after all, it appears he and his pals put their bets on the right horses, being that we are now on the eve of the Democrat-led vote to essentially signal America's surrender to al Quada and the jihadists in Iraq (source: AP/mywaynews):
"This is the debate that many of us have yearned for for four years," said Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y. The measure, expected to be approved by the House on Friday, was nonbinding. But the message was unmistakable, said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who maintained that Bush's policies "have not worked, will not work and must be changed."
In a reversal, Pelosi and the Democratic leadership decided Monday night not to give Republicans a chance to propose an alternative measure... "At the end of the debate, we will vote on a straightforward proposition: Whether we support the president's plan or oppose it," Pelosi said in her prepared remarks.
Wow. What a powerhouse woman that Pelosi is. (1) Emboldening al Zawahiri and his jihadist bretheren Compared to this, a "do-nothing Congress" would be eminently preferable. Original content is © Copyright 2007 by Jon Quixote. Email
Of course, Pelosi's rant begs the question: "Must be changed..." to WHAT???
As I documented in my email to CBS' "60 Minutes," this was a critical question that should have been --- but never was --- asked to Pelosi while she and the Democrats were campaigning, in the leadup to the November elections.
And, to the mainstream media's ongoing shame and denials, there simply is no answer at this point coming from the Democrats, except for those few who are explicitly calling for America's immediate surrender to jihadists (the Kucinich loonbats, who are advocating a complete and immediate cutoff of all funding for our soldiers).
The "non-binding resolution" that the Democrats are hellbent on pushing through is nothing more than a down-payment on America's surrender to al Quada and jihadists throughout the globe.
But at least the Democrats are going to accomplish three things:
(2) Validating their repeated proclamations that America doesn't have the stomach to sustain a fight against them
(3) Sending an unmistakable signal to our soldiers, that all they're doing is, as
Senator Obama said this weekend, "a waste"
(1) Emboldening al Zawahiri and his jihadist bretheren
Compared to this, a "do-nothing Congress" would be eminently preferable.
Original content is © Copyright 2007 by Jon Quixote. Emailjonquix@hotmail.com.