Sunday, April 08, 2007

Is JonQuixote "Fatwa-Worthy?" Maybe.

.

=============================
SEE UPDATES AT END
=============================



Well, well, well. Look what was discovered on the Web, here, via a hot lead:

"I have returned to provide my opinions on the politics and current affairs of our time, which is evidently needed in light of the vast array of anti-Islamic opinion that continues to invade our time, and this includes cyberspace (just check out my "Fatwaworthy?" links for a few examples). It is remarkable that they continue to fail to comprehend the unity and peace of Islam which is in front of them when it is written they will regret their actions at the moment of death."
And WHO, pray tell, is on that list of those who are "Fatwaworthy?" Take a look for yourself --- follow the left margin down, down down... there ya go... yup, JonQuixote is right there, amidst a list of other "contenders."


As my profile says, freedom of speech is a precious thing. I'm exercising mine.

How sad that a significant portion of the world population still believes that freedom of speech must be extinguished under threats of physical violence, in order to achieve uniformity of thought, speech, opinion and perception.

But hey, given my experience with receiving threats and more from the seething, Stalinist-emulating leftists in the blogosphere and elsewhere (you know, the "peace and tolerance and diversity and inclusiveness and tolerance" crowd) for voicing my opinions, I'll just add this to the list that I forward on to friends in law enforcement and beyond.

Just doing my little part for a better America, ya know?

--- J.Q.


===============================

UPDATE, APRIL 10: "Radical Muslim" and a mystery HuffPuffer post comments; JonQ replies, and reflects!

If you scroll down on this thread, you'll see that the first comment submitted is from Jamal, the "fatwa-issuer." The next one is from an unknown(!) HuffPoster, spouting the same boilerplate racist drivel. I responded to both.

Then, I began to wonder --- what could have possibly earned me a position on a "fatwa-list" of such heavy-hitters as
JihadWatch, Daniel Pipes, Little Green Footballs, Michelle Malkin, AtlasShrugs2000 and others? I mean, JQWorld is gaining in popularity, but is not in the same league as these others (JQWorld's most recent ranking at Technorati: #218,000 of 71 million blogs).

So what was it that could have catapulted JQWorld into these big-league fighters against radical Islamism, at least in the mind of "RadicalMuslim"? Well, I went through the archives of my blogthreads, and reviewed some of the more... hateful, threatening and/or loonbatted
(looks at HuffPosters) emails and comments I've gotten, and I think these threads might have something to do with it:

News From Londonistan: A New Correlation of Names and Polls

NY Times & BBC: Surrendering To Jihad --- Again, and Again, and Again...

France OK’s Iranian Nuke Arsenal – and MUCH MORE!!!

The Big Kahuna Of Islamist Terror Speaks To GMA's Diane Sawyer - And American Leftists!!!

American Leftists: The New Jihadist Propaganda Squad

Birth Of A Nation: Hezbollahstan

Dems Surrender to MoveOn.org; What Chance Have They Against Jihad?

News from… Europistan???

A "Cease-Fire" From Hell, Produced By Idiocy - Or Brain Malfunction?

THIS Is An Example Of The "Political Prisoners" That The World Wants Israel To Release

MSM: What Betrayal By Hezbollah, Condi Rice, The UN And Lebanon??? The Ramsey Case Is Solved!!!

Jihadist-Enabling MSM, Part 1,247 - The Washington Post

The Ghost Of Chamberlain


Now that I know that I, JQWorld fans, and those who submit story tips are onto something, we'll redouble our efforts to do our best for a better, more secure, more free, and more rational America!!!



Original content is © Copyright 2007 by Jon Quixote. Email to jonquix@hotmail.com

Saturday, April 07, 2007

American Leftists: The New Jihadist Propaganda Squad

.

Ah, yes...

... another prime example of the insanity harbored and propagated by the seething American left, which, as I've documented repeatedly here at JQWorld, is the new home of rabid Jew-hatred and anti-Israel propaganda.

On the Huffington Post on Friday, April 6, a story link was posted, with the title:

"Israel Fires Rockets Into Gaza"


Stop and think about that headline for a moment.

Why would Israel fire rockets into Gaza?

Is it because their soldiers were drunk, bored, and looking for entertainment, so they decided to launch a few rockets into Gaza, to kill some Palestinians having peaceful dinner, for laughs? Or because Israel hasn't been subjected to quite enough negative, twisted, fabricated news stories --- and because they are secretly sadomasochists, they wanted more?

Well, let's read
the actual article:
"Reuters news agency quoted residents as saying the missiles targeted militants near the Jabaliya refugee camp.

"Since the ceasefire was declared, militants have fired at least 150 rockets into Israel, while Israel carried out an air strike last month.

"Islamic Jihad said its militants and others from another group were mounting an operation near the border when Israel fired the missiles.

"Two militants were wounded in the attack, Palestinian sources said."




Unguided Katyusha rockets being launched from Palestinian jihad terrorists against civilian centers in Israel


Katyusha rockets land in Israel --- many packed with ball bearings, to inflict maximum civilian deaths

Wow. 150 rocket attacks against Israel. Two retaliatory strikes by Israel. 150-2. Why?

Because as Israel has repeatedly said, and the facts have documented, the Palestinians launch rockets from random locations against civilian population centers in Israel, whereas Israel attempts to hit only those who are launching the rockets.

For brevity, I'm not going to go into the extent to which Palestinians are teaching their children that to murder Jews is the highest duty of their lives... and arming them with the means of doing so. That fact has been documented by others, extensively.

Instead, let's look at what the jihadist propaganda squad
(also known as the new American left) had to say about this incident (thread located here) at one of their favorite cyber-gathering spots, the Huffington Post.

Particularly insane/inflammatory comments are highlighted in red:
When Israel says they "Targeted Militants", it always means they killed some poor Civilians mostly Women and Children.
By: forpeace on April 06, 2007 at 08:17pm

Americans....read behind the story a bit here and understand that:(1) These missiles aimed at the refugee camp were made in America,(2) Paid for by YOUR tax dollars,(3) Fired from US made and paid for aircraft,(4) By pilots who were trained by America at America's expense. Israel has no economy. No real industry except government, and most of that is military, aimed at killing Palestinians. Mostly women and children. Israel is a giant welfare state that YOU, Americans pay for to the tune of US$15million per day. Israel is a leech on the US Treasury, and would not exist except it is propped up by successive corrupt US Administrations. And you, dear Americans pay for it all. You have no health care system, crumbling infrastructure, violent and unachieving schools and a military that has had its power and integrity squandered by criminals. Thanks to Israel. Happy Passover! Happy Easter! Feel better now?
By: 1TruthTeller on April 06, 2007 at 08:24pm

Back in the late seventies the Israelis went into Lebanon, and then all of a sudden, in less than two days time, the Israelis turned around and went back to Israel. Years later we found out that President Carter made a phone call to Prime Minister Begin telling him that if they didn't turn around, he would report to Congress that the new F-16's we just sent them were being used as offensive weapons. Thus ending new shipments to Israel for a while. That's all it takes...
By: troubledwawa on April 06, 2007 at 08:39pm

I'm starting to have no sympathy for the Israelinazis.
They get what they deserve.
By: motormouth on April 06, 2007 at 08:55pm

Unable to compete on a level playing field, Israel destroys Lebanon's and the Palestinians' source of economic sustenance, like orchards, olive groves and tourism. Then it steals their land and fences it in.All the evidence points to a failed society and a failed economy, and a violent bully flailing about with impunity trying not to drown in a quagmire of its own making. That's Israel for you. Ahmeninejad was right, Israel will wipe itself off the map, by its own cruelty.
By: 1TruthTeller on April 06, 2007 at 09:21pm

It's Good Friday, so of course somebody had to die..Shalom..
By: TJTelecaster on April 06, 2007 at 10:17pm

It's criminal. War crimes.Israels Genocide of the Palestinians.
By: tellintruth on April 06, 2007 at 10:45pm

Israel cannot use the weapons we supply to them for offensive action. Why the hell can't we pull the plug on this senseless slaughter? I am sick of dancing around these Israeli apologists....
By: bikerdude on April 06, 2007 at 11:07pm

The state of Israel was formed solely because of a successful terrorist campaign against Britain. Why should we accord them any more legitimacy than we accord Hamas? At least Hamas makes a point of providing social services to their constituents, something the Haganah, the terror organization that became the Israeli government, never did.
By: SamThornton on April 06, 2007 at 11:27pm

Megaphone desktop tool is a Microsoft Windows application distributed by the World Union of Jewish Students and other pro-Israel organizations, through the Giyus.org website.Megaphone, released on July 19, 2006, delivers real-time alerts about key articles, videos, blogs, and surveys to community members. Members can easily voice their opinions and work together to support Israel on the public opinion front. The tool has been endorsed by Amir Gissin, head of the Public Affairs Department of the Foreign Ministry of IsraelThe web site of the Application claims these organizations as partners.)... (on and on and on...)
By: ghosts on April 06, 2007 at 11:55pm

Oh STFU about this anti-semitism garbage. Jewish and israeli groups have been using that bat to beat democracy into a pulp all to arm Israel to continue its genocide against the Palestinians and wars against the innocent of the Middle East. The only groups terrorizing campuses are Jewish, Israeli and zionist groups. Campuswatch.com (This Daniel Pipes Facist organization that
terrorizes any intellectual and institution that criticizes Israel)They Dared to Speak Out: People & Institutions confront Israeli Lobbysby former Congressman Paul Findlay documents with impressive and terrifying accuracy the intellectual terrorism and crippling of Americas democracy by Jewish and Zionist groups.An article by Harvard researchers outlining israels strangle hold on Americas foreign policy...
By: tellintruth on April 07, 2007 at 12:01am

Didn't Israel kill SIX UN envoys in Lebanon this past summer?Yes. They did. Finally, daily rockets are NOT landing in Israel. You're just lying again b/c the truth makes Israel look criminal.
By: tellintruth on April 07, 2007 at 12:09am

On the same day that those scumbag Jewish soldiers shot and killed two men in the back, they shot another in the legs and left him to bleed to death.This happens every single day.Israels will shoot Palestinians and leave them to bleed to death, preventing medical personnel to reach them and forcing their families to watch their loved ones die. The purpose of this barbarism is to break the will and spirit of the Palestinian people.
By: tellintruth on April 07, 2007 at 12:46am

The truth is:There has not been a single rocket fired into Israel since November 2006. Instead of addressing the fact that she LIED and got caught in yet another lie, she just keeps lying and squawking. Why dont you and your shlomos move to Tel Aviv and let my Hammas supervisors know exactly where to find you.
By: tellintruth on April 07, 2007 at 01:22am

Is there a Nation out there that will STOP the JEWS from killing innocent woman and children once and for all ?I just cant wait for the next Hollocaust, it will be faster and cleaner now that Seimens built a 500 seater Microwave Oven.Why is a person who plays the piano called a pianist but a person who drives a racecar is not called a racist?
By: BUSHCHENEYOILNAZIS on April 07, 2007 at 04:49am

I dont HATE JEWS....I believe that every ARAB should own ONE !
By: BUSHCHENEYOILNAZIS on April 07, 2007 at 05:12am

Sometimes the israelis do that to divert attention from the local trouble and scandals that are gripping their leaders from sex scandals , and corruption and money laundering. so the locals can watch something else happening in gaza for a change .
By: nefertiti on April 07, 2007 at 05:15am


AMY GOODMAN: In 2006, you write that George W. Bush said to his father, "What's a neocon?"
ANDREW COCKBURN: That's right. One of the rare moments of sort of communication between the two. Bush said to -- they were out at Kennebunkport, and Bush Jr. says, "Can I ask you a question? What's a neocon?" And the father says, "Do you want names or a description?" The President says, "I'll take a description." He says, "I'll give it to you in one word: Israel..."
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/07/1436239...
By: HatingTheGame on April 07, 2007 at 08:38am

Wow, huh?

To be fair, there were commenters who spoke out against these rabid Jew-hating, Israel-bashing on this thread... but they were a distinct, unsuccessful minority.


Scan the thread for yourself. Then recall Arianna Huffington's explanation (which I dissected and demolished, here) for why HuffPost administrators surgically scrubbed the infamous "Cheney Thread," transforming it from a 19-page (est. 500-post) rant by American leftists --- wishing that the Taliban had been successful in assassinating him --- into a 1- page thread with 12 innocuous comments: in her words, to remove "a miniscule portion" of comments by "clearly unhinged, fringe" commenters.

Well, in this case, it was the folks who brought a modicum of truth to this thread that constituted the "miniscule portion" of posters. And just in case HuffPost administrators decide to yank the thread of "unhinged, fringe" blistering anti-Jew, Israel-bashing hatred... I've saved the thread to PDF, and will gladly email it to inquirers.

Why does such rabid Jew-hatred and insane Israel-bashing fester in the American left?

Could it have something to do with the effort that jihadists and their supporters have made to infiltrate and indoctrinate students on American college campuses, which themselves are dominated by leftist faculty, administration, etc.? What role do Islamist "civil rights" organizations such as CAIR, MPAC, etc. play?

Well, do any of these questions really matter --- being that the opinion-makers and perception-creators in the MSM will not cover any of it?

Yes, they do.

A lot.

And there's still another question that needs to be asked: When will American Jews be made aware of what's going on in the American left --- and who is really standing up for Israel, and Jews in general, and who is standing for their destruction?

It's clear that the MSM isn't going to touch this with a 10-foot kaffiya. So it's up to the blogosphere to inform them. Pass the link to this thread to your friends, along with this link to an earlier thread, in which I documented the many previous instances of threads like this.



=====================================

UPDATE, APRIL 7: LEST WE FORGET THE DAILYKOS "ZIONAZI" DISPLAY THIS WEEK

Fresh on the heels of this jihadist propaganda on HuffPost, let's recall the Israel-bashing loonbattedness that was hosted this week at another prime gathering spot for American leftists, the DailyKos (hat tip: LGF, here):





Original content is © Copyright 2007 by Jon Quixote. Email to jonquix@hotmail.com



.





























Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Countdown To "DiFi-Mania"

.

As noted here, here, here and elsewhere at JonQuixoteWorld, the mainstream media gets fixated on "mania" stories, seemingly only when they relate to one of several situations:

  • To promote leftists and their causes ("Gore-Mania," "Obama-Mania")
    .
  • To focus on corruption of non-leftists ("Abarahamoff-Mania")
    .
  • To divert attention from (or pretend to ignore) Islamist terror ("JonBonet-Mania")
    .
  • To divert attention from other vital stories, such as the revelations about Sandy Burger stealing and destroying one-of-a-kind national security documents (more here) --- which insiders speculate indicated the level of incompetence and corruption within the Clinton administration regarding its approach to combating terrorism --- to focus on much more important stories, such as "AmericanIdol-Mania," "Oscar-Mania," and "(insert your non-story-of-choice here)-Mania"


So, it is with eager, breathless anticipation that JonQuixoteWorld is waiting for the MSM to redeem itself, by focusing all its billions of dollars of resources on the evolving corruption allegations against Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA), which may well be the single largest political corruption scandal in American history.


Thus, today begins our countdown until Katie, Brian, Charles, Chris, Keith, Barbara, Rosie and the rest of the MSM gang begin to focus their vulture-like obsession and attention on the esteemed Democractic Senator who, as we all know, like all good leftists, "means well," and only does what she does "for the children."

Waiting...

Waiting...

Waiting...


Uh-huh.

That's OK. I'm an optimist, and as such, will keep vigil for when the MSM finally decides to break out of its congenital leftist bias, in which they will go to any extent to protect and promote leftist politicians, while stopping at nothing to destroy non-leftists.

Waiting...

Waiting...

Waiting...


=============================

MAY 1 UPDATE: CRICKETS STILL CHIRPING; ARTICLE IN THE HILL

Today, this article appeared in The Hill, an update of sorts on the pending "Di-Fi Mania" vigil we're keeping here at JQWorld.

Well, with all the news about the VA Tech massacre, the Bush war-funding veto, the Washington madame scandal, the "American Idol" contestants, the 2008 presidential horse-race, the latest in the Donald Trump-Rosie O'Donnell feud, what is shaping up to be the biggest single act of political corruption in Washington history is still being swept under the rug by the entire MSM.

That's ok. JQWorlders are optimists. With enough pressure, maybe just this once the MSM will make an exception, and begin to focus its manic-like hunger for controversy on Diane Feinstein. Say.... in 2028?



Original content is © Copyright 2007 by Jon Quixote. Email to jonquix@hotmail.com


.

Monday, April 02, 2007

The "New DemocratSpeak," Part I

=================================
SEE UPDATES AT END
=================================



In George Orwell’s classic, “1984,” he coined the term “Newspeak” to describe the means by which language had been manipulated to cloak and advance the exact opposite of what was supposedly being said.

“War Is Peace,” "Ignorance Is Strength," "Freedom Is Slavery," etc. See more
here.


Well, apparently the new Democratic majority on Capitol Hill has taken Orwell’s “newspeak” to heart, and the bill they’ve introduced today is a testament to how hardcore their adherence to such principles actually are. I call it the "New DemocratSpeak."

Senators Harry Reid and Russ Feingold have now proposed cutting off funding to our soldiers, immediately, to facilitate their "withdrawl," which they claim is "not surrender."


Senators Reid and Feingold, co-authors of the "Surrender Iraq to Jihad Bill of 2007"
Reid with a classic one-fingered salute to anyone who tries to tell him of the short- and long-term consequences for America if this bill passes

When a military force relocates one group of soldiers from one battlefront to another, in the same theater, that's called "redeployment."

But when a military force is ordered to "withdraw," to reoccupy bases at home or anywhere the battle is not being fought, leaving the enemy on the battlefield, that is called "surrender."

This is true whether it is ordered by the duly-elected Commander In Chief --- or even, as is the case today, illegitimately, by legislators who wrongfully think they are legally empowered to supercede the CiC's command authority, because the CiC won't stand up to them.

The jihadists view this proposed action by the Democrats to be America's surrender.

Our soldiers, most of whom sincerely believe they can win this battle, also believe it to be surrender.

But apparently, there's a good chance that the "New DemocratSpeak" will prevail --- unless something is done to stop it.


The Democrats on the Hill, knowing their leftist allies have a stranglehold over America's educational system --- and that they have intellectually disarmed our population --- know that there is no limit to the linguistic games that they can play with Americans, and "withdrawl" (whether "strategic" or not) is merely one of these games.

If these Democratic leaders were honest, they'd admit that they want to pull our soldiers out of all battlefields against jihadists, right now, today. That's what their new, seething leftist base has been telling them to do, right?

There are principled arguments to be made on both sides, but only one side is currently making them (kind of).

And it isn't the Democrats.

The Republicans (and most nauseatingly, the RINOs) certainly have not done as good of a job as they could have, and should have done, to explain the nature of this battle, and the short- and long-term consequences if we withdraw, thereby declaring our surrender of Iraq to the jihadists.


But until this debate is focused on principles, which are clearly and openly expressed, the Democrats are going to continue to be able to get away with this kind of newspeak --- or as I prefer, the "New Democratspeak."



==========================================

UPDATE 1, APRIL 4: THE NEW DEMOCRATSPEAK, PART II --- A "Global War on Terror" No More!!!

According to a
MilitaryTimes.org article, the (esteemed) Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill decreed in a just-discovered March memo that the military engagements that U.S. forces are deployed in around the world shall no longer be referred to as the "Global War On Terror." The "New DemocratSpeak" masters on the Hill explained it:

The House Armed Services Committee is banishing the global war on terror from the 2008 defense budget. This is not because the war has been won, lost or even called off, but because the committee’s Democratic leadership doesn’t like the phrase. A memo for the committee staff, circulated March 27, says the 2008 bill and its accompanying explanatory report that will set defense policy should be specific about military operations and “avoid using colloquialisms.”

The “global war on terror,” a phrase first used by President Bush shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S., should not be used, according to the memo. Also banned is the phrase the “long war,” which military officials began using last year as a way of acknowledging that military operations against terrorist states and organizations would not be wrapped up in a few years.

Committee staff members are told in the memo to use specific references to specific operations instead of the Bush administration’s catch phrases. The memo, written by Staff Director Erin Conaton, provides examples of acceptable phrases, such as “the war in Iraq,” the “war in Afghanistan," “operations in the Horn of Africa” or “ongoing military operations throughout the world.”

Read the rest here.

This really shouldn't come as a surprise. For decades, the Democrats have been using language to manipulate public perceptions, and avoid the nasty business of attributing objective characteristics to both ideas and people. There are innumerable examples of this phenomena, but most recently, a Florida state legislator announced her plan to ban the phrase "illegal aliens" from state documents (
here), because she finds it "offensive."

In other, as-yet unannounced "New DemocratSpeak" news:

"Bank robbery" shall now be referred to as acts of "involuntary non-customer cash withdrawal"

"Rape" shall now be referred to as acts of "nonconsensual intimate relations"

"Murder" shall now be referred to as "premeditated, premature, non-peaceful discontinuance of life"


In a way, however, the Democrats are actually right. The war we're engaged in should be referred to as "America's Ongoing War Against Islamist Barbarism and Totalitarianism."

But that would be very, very, very politically incorrect. After all, we wouldn't want to "make things worse," right? (That's the excuse that Speaker Pelosi gave, through her spokesman, as to why she would not allow debate in the House re a resolution condemning Iran's recent seizure of 15 British soldiers, and demanding their safe and immediate release; see Item 3,
here).

And we most certainly wouldn't want to be precise in our wording --- because that is the kryptonite to the "New DemocratSpeak."

UPDATE: See Part II of this thread, here.






Original content is © Copyright 2007 by Jon Quixote. Email to jonquix@hotmail.com



.

Friday, March 30, 2007

Nancy Pelosi: Madame Dhimmi

.

As in previous cases, I find myself wanting to utter the word "unbelievable" when seeing some of the antics of the Democrats on the Hill.

But three events in the last week go beyond unbelievable
--- they demonstrate both the level of dhimmitude to which leading Democrats have descended into, and indicate how they are able to take brazen advantage of most Americans' total ignorance of the most fundamental Constitutional principles and provisions at the root of our republic.

Item 1 is already old news: The Democrats bribed, cajoled, threatened and intimidated their own membership in order to gain a squeaky-thin majority to pass "The Democratic Pork, Military Spending and Surrender-to-Jihad Bill of 2007" (here).

Unfortunately, the MSM and Republicans have both been silent on the fact that Congress has two powers related to war: to declare war, and to fund it. The Congress authorized this war, not via declaration, but by deferring to the President (arguably unconstitutional in itself). They do not, however, have the power under our Constitution to dictate how a war is fought, or to dictate anything to the President of the United States concerning war, that is legally binding, anyway. More on this here.


Item 2: Nancy Pelosi appoints herself Acting Secretary Of State, or President Pro Tem --- of the United States of America,
by declaring that she is going to conduct one-on-one negotiations with Basher Assad, President of Syria, a major sponsor of Islamist terrorism (under Uncle Mahmoud's diligent tutilege). Read the story here, here and here.

Apparently, no one told her --- or the American people, via our wonderful government-run school system, and leftist-dominated MSM --- that the Speaker of the House of Representatives has absolutely no authority to conduct foreign policy, and is, in legal terms, arguably prevented from doing so.


Item 3: Nancy Pelosi refuses to allow the House of Representatives to issue a resolution condemning Iran's seizure of 15 British soldiers
(which, ironically, her counterpart in the Senate, Harry Reid, actually did permit).

According to
an AP article today:

The Senate on Thursday, before adjourning for its one-week break, passed a resolution condemning the act "in the strongest possible terms" and calling for the sailors "immediate, safe and unconditional release."

Pelosi's spokesman Brendan Daly said the speaker was reluctant to weigh in on the incident without knowing that such a message would do more good than harm. Daly said the British government had not asked Congress to try to pressure Tehran.

"The leadership discussed it and agreed that inserting Congress into an international crisis while ongoing would not be helpful," Daly said.

I see. So, applying that principle to an attack of appendicitis, were Madame Speaker a physician, she most certainly would not want to aggravate the situation by performing necessary surgery; or if she were an off-duty firefighter, she most definitely would not want to call out the fire department upon witnessing a house on fire, for fear of making the fire even angrier; and if she were... well, you get the idea.

The #1 tactic of Islamist fanatics is to intimidate into silence all of their critics and opponents.

And in the case of Speaker Pelosi, it's clear that this tactic is working like a charm.

Here we have a blatant act of war by Iran against one of our closest allies, and Madame Speaker Pelosi refuses to even allow such a declaration to be debated among U.S. Representatives. After all, she had to board Pelosi 1 to rush off to conduct illegitimate foreign policy with Basher Assad, and couldn't be troubled with considering a "provocative action" such as actually expressing outrage, and a demand for the British soldiers' immediate and safe return.

Congratulations, Democrats and leftists.

Had the American people even the most fundamental understanding of our Constitution, they would be marching in the streets to stop this insanity. But the American people have, over the last half-century, been intellectually disarmed by the leftist-dominated educational establishment, and we are now staring square into the result; the Constitution is anything we want it to be, or at least anything the Democratic leadership says it is, and provides for (e.g. a "right" to health care, a job, a home, etc.).

One thing is for damned sure:
The jihadist monsters around the world must be thanking Allah continuously for the fact that, as evidenced by Speaker Pelosi, America just took several more lurches towards dhimmitude, all within the span of barely seven days.

To coin a phrase, a heckuva job, I'd say.



==============================================

UPDATE, MAY 1: THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES IN EGYPT OF MADAME DHIMMI'S VISIT TO SYRIA

Here are some of the unreported results of Pelosi's unconstitutional usurpation of U.S. foreign policy.


==============================================

UPDATE, MAY 2: NANCY PELOSI GETS THUMBS-UP FROM SYRIANS


Isn't that sweet? File this one under "Lunatic Unconstitutional Actions Have Consequences."






Original content is © Copyright 2007 by Jon Quixote. Email to jonquix@hotmail.com


.





Thursday, March 29, 2007

The HuffPost Tipping Point - Ban JonQ (Again)

.

OK, I admit it.

Although I had fully intended to not return to HuffPost after they'd banned me for the 25th time
(see here), and in fact I did not post for nearly a month, with the leadup to and advent of "The Democratic Pork, Military Spending and Surrender-to-Jihad Bill of 2007" (here), I wanted to put in my two cents.
(Or, as the Jew-hating whackjob conspiracy theorists that infest the leftist blogosphere would put it, my two "shekels," being that they claim anyone who disagrees with them must be a paid agent of AIPAC, Mossad, or the AJC)


So I created a new login, "BanJonQforThe999thTime," and had my say. First, from secure, undisclosed locations, as my login ID and IP address were banned.

But then, for some reason, this login --- and my IP address --- were mysteriously "unbanned," several weeks ago.

Well, right up until today (March 29), when I commented on the Senate's narrow passage of this bill --- and was banned again, shortly before noon:





Gee, I wonder, was it posts like
this one that drove the HuffPost admins over the edge?
(Note: This post was entirely within HuffPost's stated "Comments Policy"):




===========================================
*****************AN IMPORTANT EMAIL******************
===========================================

To: American Leftists

From: Al Quada in Iraq

Date: 29 March 2007

Dear Leftists:

What wonderful news to come out of your House and Senate!!! We told you long ago that eventually you'd surrender to us, and with your continued help, it appears that day is now upon us.

We want a new infrastructure for al Quada and our affiliated organizations, especially one with something resembling an industrial base, and especially with lots and lots of oil that we can then sell on the world markets to fund our efforts.

Bush and others kept telling you all this, and yet, praise Allah, you held fast, and have now signaled America's willingness to surrender Iraq to us. But then again, we both know that this surrender represents far more.... it represents the down payment on your eventual total surrender to us.

Your monkey-faced president assured you that he'd veto this bill, and yet you still persisted. If he does indeed veto it, it will be up to YOU (less MCMentalCase and SteveSeattle, who are legally prohibited from coming within 50 feet of normal people)
to pressure your Democratic leaders and RINOs to push for an override.

As most of you are completely ignorant of your own Constitution, let me enlighten you: that means that you need 2/3 of your elected representatives to vote to overturn monkey-faced Bush's veto.

We will certainly remember your dhimmitude, and will make sure that we cut your heads off with sharp blades, as a courtesy, instead of the rusty, dull saws that we use with complete infidels.

Praise Allah, peace be upon Him, that you saw that your only course was to surrender.

Thank you again -

Ayman al Zawahri
#2 of al Quada



PS: Oh, and also, it is so very helpful to know that you are devoting your limited law enforcement and Congressional resources not into investigating and pursuing jihad in America, and all our nefarious activities... instead focusing on Republican attorneys.

Good work!!!


====================================

Wow, that's some heady endorsement, loonbats!!!

Congratulations.

What an accomplishment...




By: BanJonQforthe999thTime on March 29, 2007 at 11:29am


Well, it needed to be said --- so I (er, I mean, "Dr. Zawahri") said it.

To the friends I've met at HuffPost
(yes, indeed I've met folks there with whom I've become friends), I trust you'll keep up the good fight. Never give the off-the-charts America-subverting lunatic leftist bastards an even break (I know you won't).

I admit I was wasting too much time there. But the opportunity to confront the very folks who are supporting the leftooned leaders on the Hill --- and who are serving to only embolden our enemies, and who are poised to cause so much long-term damage to America --- can be a venture that a self-employed guy like me can find lots of fun.

To my detractors, well, I trust you'll also keep spouting off your hate, propaganda and lies, in order to defend what I believe is the indefensible.

There are a few of my detractors who, I believe, sincerely believe what they say, and say it with great eloquence. I've even found some points of theirs that I agree with. But I'd ask them, please consider addressing the raging hatred, propaganda and Jew-bashing that goes on --- almost completely unchallenged --- on those threads in which we got to know each other.

As for me, I'll just keep blogging here at JQWorld as events warrant. And I will, as always, expose the lies, hypocrisy,evasions and especially the America-bashing propaganda that sites like HuffPost, DailyKos and others in the leftoonosphere rely upon to advance their agendas.

I've proven to be devastatingly precise and effective in the past (see
here, here, here, here, here, here, and here).

I assure you, that was mere prelude. :)



============================================

UPDATE 1, MARCH 30: AL QUADA #2 THANKS HUFFPOSTERS FOR HELPING TO BAN JONQUIXOTE!!!!

Wow, who could have seen this coming??? Go to
this thread, and see the post at 7:29am from "AymanAlZawahri." Revealing!!!

============================================

UPDATE 2, MARCH 30:
JOE LIEBERMAN, DEMOCRATIC PARIAH, "GETS IT"

Wow, again --- I can't recall an editorial in which more truth was spoken in fewer words
(which is exactly why Lieberman is about to be savaged by the Stepford Democratic Propaganda Brigade): see USA Today editorial here.

============================================


.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

The Secret Questions That Valerie Plame WASN'T Asked...

.

What a way to end the week, eh? Democrats censoring all the really important questions and subjects from Valerie Plame's entertainment-testimony-hearing-circus.

(Of course, it wouldn't have been complete without a pre-op transsexual CodePink lunatic in the hearing room, to support Val & Joe).


But as happens on occasion, JQWorld is sometimes privy to secret emails and documents that elude other bloggers and news sources.


This is one of those times.


So here are some of the questions that the Republicans at today's hearing (and even some Democrats) wanted answers to, but were prevented from asking by one of the House's new power-brokers, Loonbat Brigadeer General Henry Waxman (D-CA):

Q) "Mrs. Plame, how did you feel you would advance your cause by posing with your schlub hubby, Lyin' Joe Wilson, in artsy-fartsy pictures for gossip magazines?"

Q) "Mrs. Plame, is it true that you objected to our plan to play the opening song from 'Married With Children' as you entered the hearing room with Lyin' Joe Wilson? And if so, is this because you resent being referred to as the 'Al & Peg Bundy' of international intrigue?" (click here to play!)

Q) "Mrs. Plame, do you resent the fact that Patrick Fitzgerald, the Sherlock Holmes of your 'outing,' has not been, is not, and will not be investigating or prosecuting anyone for this 'outing'?"

Q) "Mrs. Plame, why did your husband lie when he testified that you had
nothing to do with sending him to Niger to drink sweet tea with arms merchants?"

Q) "And finally, Mrs. Plame, how in the WORLD did an obviously intelligent, articulate hottie like you ever end up with a schlub like Lyin' Joe Wilson?"

We could have heard the fascinating answers to all these questions, had they been asked; but of course, after 12 years in the political wilderness, snot-nosed "he-men" like Waxman were insistent on having their own way, or gaveling down their fellow committee members. So were were left with very little. We still don't have a conclusive answer (from Fitzgerald or anyone else) as to whether Mrs. Plame was a covert agent at the time of her 'outing' or wasn't.


Instead, we were treated to a back-and-forth between Henry Waxman
(he of mysterioius lineage and genetics; above) and Victoria Toensing, who is a genuine understated hottie, with a brain and backbone to match. Toensing tried to take Waxman to school on the law, but of course, he'd have none of it; he ain't gonna be showed up by some uppity Republican female attorney, now is he!?

Then again, there are worse things to do with a spring morning than having to look at a hottie like Valerie Plame. (Even Rush gave Val his Maha Rushi seal of approval!)

Still, one must wonder, how many bottles of wine did Lyin' Joe had to juice her up with to get her to marry him?

A lady never tells...





To be continued...



Original content is © Copyright 2007 by Jon Quixote. Email to jonquix@hotmail.com



HuffPost: Using An Outright Lie To Foment Hate

I guess the folks behind The HuffingtonPost haven't had quite enough of being exposed, discredited and humiliated with indisputable facts regarding their actions lately, and those of the loonbatted visitors to their site (Particularly, by me - here, here and elsewhere throughout JQWorld)

Yet here we go again --- with one of the most blatant solicitations of hatred from their "commenters" based on a deliberately, demonstrably false headline, that I've seen there yet (and I've seen a LOT there).

Regardless of your views on John McCain
(mine are disclosed at the end), assuming you care about the truth, take a look at this screaming headline:



Do Condoms Help Stop Spread Of HIV? McCain: "You've Stumped Me"


Wow. So according to the HuffPost, Senator John McCain doesn't know if condoms help stop the spread of HIV? Well gee, if that's true, then of course, it'd be pretty shocking --- especially matched with that picture.

One little problem: It's a LIE --- and the HuffPost headline writers could not have avoided knowing that it's a lie.

Here
is the article that the story (NYTimes blog) cites, and below is the "money quote" --- as cited in the HuffPost thread:


Q: "So no contraception, no counseling on contraception. Just abstinence. Do you think contraceptives help stop the spread of HIV?"

Mr. McCain:
(Long pause) "You've stumped me."

Newsflash, HuffPost headline writers and commenters: McCain was NOT asked whether condoms help stop the spread of HIV. He was asked whether "contraceptives" do.

And here's yet another inconvenient truth for ya to chew on: most "contraceptives" DO NOT help stop the spread of HIV.


Contraceptives include any of a number of things --- including birth-control pills, spermicidal foams and jellies, IUDs, etc., NONE OF WHICH do ANYTHING to help stop the spread of HIV.

Condoms, which DO help to stop the spread of HIV, are also contraceptives, but that is NOT the question that was asked of McCain.

And if the HuffPost users who were so quick to condemn McCain over what he was accused of saying --- but which he did not --- would have the mental capacity to comprehend the "Quick Read" feature that HuffPost provides, (below), which contained the exact excerpt litsed above (which is also placed at the top of the thread itself), they would have realized that once again, HuffPost headline writers were deliberately misleading them.


Apparently, we can add reading comprehension to the list of the many defects that afflict the seething, rabid "new left," whose constituent members are so quick to condemn anyone, based on false, manipulated information, and which claims it has now "bought, paid for and owns" the DNC (here).

And to facilitate the rapid, easy spread of this propaganda, users are encouraged to just click on the area at lower left where it says "Spread The News!" (in the screen above), and you can instantly email this outright lie to as many folks as you want, via the screen below:

Marx, Goebbels and Mao would be SO proud... (sniff!): Ultra-speedy propagation of lies!

So, by denying what was asked, then manipulating McCain's answer, it fit the HuffPost headline writers' agenda: to skewer and discredit McCain by any means necessary, including a deliberate, outright falsehood
, which they knew --- or could reasonably anticipate, based on previous experience --- would incite hatred, hysteria and more among their "peaceful, tolerant, inclusive, diverse" body of whacked-out users.

And surprise, surprise, surprise, that was exactly the result of this latest example of misleading/false headlines at HuffPost. Here is but a sampling of comments from the "new left" --- the brigade of seething, hate-filled, America-bashing zombies --- that has taken over the DNC. Keep in mind this is just a sampling; to see the rest, go directly to
the thread:
Run McCain out of town on that stump!Jerk!What poor excuse of a politician and to think this fool thinks he's qualified to be President!!We're currently suffering threw 6 years of this BS I don't think we need another president who's so out of touch with the general population of the United States never mind the rest of the world.McCain you're a clown!**
By: chartoo on March 16, 2007 at 08:07pm

My oh my; how can there be so many damn stupid people in congress. What a complete ass this guy makes of himself.Peace to you and the world.
By: paixa3 on March 16, 2007 at 09:02pm

He's got to be dumber about HIV/AIDS even than Reagan was. That takes some doing.
By: OhioBob on March 16, 2007 at 09:03pm

Does McCain seriously think we would consider him a "serious" candidate after this?First, CFR, then illegal immigration, now condoms...what planet is John on?Do we need age limits on candidates?
By: blurredtruth on March 16, 2007 at 09:06pm

Well, that solves that: McCain is officially a moron. There are teenagers who know that condoms stop the spread of HIV. For McCain to be so uninformed -- or unwilling to give a real opinion so as not to piss off the Bible belters -- is inexcusable.
By: massive on March 16, 2007 at 09:08pm

How could that be? We've known about HIV/AIDS for years, its mechanism has been decoded and we even have vaccines. Little schoolkids know what AIDS is. What's not to know about it?Oh, right. McCain is a Republican. Nevermind.
By: grainger5 on March 16, 2007 at 09:15pm

How many years in Congress? How many briefings? Has he ever read a newspaper? Of course he is pandering to the religious right, but he is also playing with the lives of his constituents. He is unfit to serve.
By: sissymonster on March 16, 2007 at 09:15pm

This article was painful to read. The man is losing his mind. His wife and advisors really need to set him down and tell him that he's got no chance to be nominated. Get him off the road and out of the race.They can save him alot of embarrassment.
By: deeintexas on March 16, 2007 at 09:19pm

OK, so Mr. Straight-Talk Express can't give a straight answer. Lame.What's wrong, John? Not allowed to have your own opinion? Pitiful.Do you *really* need to go talk to your handlers before having a mind of your own? Pathetic.
By: CapedCrusader on March 16, 2007 at 09:25pm

LOFL"you've stumped me"What a coincidence ... that's what the pedophilia lovin republicans say every time they swap positions with the local GOP children! The GOP ... way out of their closet ... and well into yours!
By: CarlVVV on March 16, 2007 at 09:34pm

This is really not funny. The guy is a typical far right dipshit. Dangerous people.Man, this takes the cake. This will look VERY bad for us if the world sees that we put yet another idiot in charge. Think about it. Stupid enough to keep Bush in office two terms and now, another one? Don't do it BJ. Even if it means you having to vote for Hillary....... haha/hohowhat next?
By: ExRepublican on March 16, 2007 at 09:40pm

Perhaps it's dementia, perhaps he thinks it doesn't affect him so, why bother knowing. Whatever the case, MCCAIN is a LOSER. He DOES NOT represent his state and does not deserve to be commander in chief.
By: queeraz on March 16, 2007 at 10:07pm

If he wasn't a typical lying Republican who supports torture and an illegal war, I'd feel sorry for him because clearly he is becoming senile. He should know about condoms as all military guys were issued condoms to prevent VD during Vietnam.
By: FoolsontheHill on March 16, 2007 at 10:11pm

The h*ll with being president! Why is McCain still allowed to vote?
By: Michael7843853 on March 16, 2007 at 10:17pm

This comment by McCain is so unresponsible words fail to describe....I'm sick of the Republix party's attempt to muddy the waters of science to the point of risking and taking the lives of others. It's just effing infuriating. How the hell can anyone take someone like that seriously? Thankfully he's jumped the shark... no way this guy's gonna be the nominee.
By: Clevelandchick on March 16, 2007 at 10:34pm

Cool. Then bend over, John, and let me plow a load into you bareback.A few months later you'll be wishing you were pro-condom, Bitch.
By: leoninearies on March 16, 2007 at 10:40pm

Oh come on McCain! Have you lost your fucking mind? You insult us with your answer, which is,"I can't answer that because I have to check to see wht my handlers tell me my position on this is." Is that the kind of president you would be? At least Bush can tell you what he thinks, even if it doesn't jive with 2/3 of the country. You are a disgrace, sir! Don't come out on your bullshit express bus and expect us to take you seriously with comments like that. What do you take us for? Damn man, have you just lost you mind, or what?
By: whereisJesus on March 16, 2007 at 10:45pm

When I was young I really thought that in order to run and hold office you had to be really, really smart. Damn was I a fool! McCain doesn't know about basic sex, Bush can't open his mouth without someone telling him what lie to tell. If he speaks extemporaneously(say that if you can shrub) he can't even put a simple sentence together. If an alien race comes here after we've made ourselves extinct, I don't think they are going to find as as being very bright.
By: TheHandyman on March 16, 2007 at 11:04pm

Sorry to spring that NEW HIV/AIDS subject on ya grandpa.MOTHERF*CKER! how many years have we been educating people about HIV?oh Yeah, 25 years, and how many of those G*D DAMN years have you been a Senator..oh yeah ALL OF THEM!
By: underbear1 on March 17, 2007 at 12:01am

Why do all these Republicans need someone to lead them by the hand,is it possible the shrub is the smart one?
All the testimony from these old farts sounds like a geriatric Altzeimer daycare center.These are the people running our country,sending our boys to die,starting wars.............
By: bushmocker on March 17, 2007 at 12:16am

Did he really go from being his own man to being a fucking jerk?
By: JoeO on March 17, 2007 at 01:13am


Some commenters asked why McCain is still allowed to vote in the Senate.

I would argue that it's folks like these commenters who are FAR less qualified to vote if they cannot comprehend two simple sentences, provided up-front by HuffPost, that expose the lie that this headline represents. Oops, I forgot... these are the "enlightened, caring, sharing, loving, peaceful, tolerant and inclusive" among our society. Yeah.

Oh, and a note to the HuffPost techies:
It doesn't matter if you surgially scrub this thread of all these comments, or remove the thread altogether; I've saved the entire thing to a PDF to prove that it existed --- which I neglected to do re the infamous "Cheney Thread."


DISCLOSURE: MY OWN VIEW ON JOHN McCAIN:

As a conservative libertarian, I cannot support McCain for president.

Although I enormously respect his service in our military, and the character which enabled him to endure and move beyond the horrendous abuse he suffered for years at the hands of his captors, I beleive he has gone way off the rails of the libertarian foundation upon which America was built, and our Constitution is constructed.

Most notably, I contend the McCain-Feingold campaign finance "reform" bill was among the most blatant, naked assaults on freedom of speech in recent history, and his endless compromises with leftists in the Senate is getting to the point of being intolerable.

Sen. McCain does speak forcefully and with principle when he discusses the war that jihadist lunatics have declared on America, and his statements on free markets and economic liberty are in line with my own. I admire his tireless efforts to expose and combat pork-barrel spending, for which he's gotten no shortage of criticism from both Democratic and Republican colleagues and vested interests. That takes real courage.

But if his views on something as fundamental as free speech are based on so shallow an interpretation of individual liberty, of the right to support candidates of your choice with financial contributions up to and including the waning days of an election cycle, then his entire outlook must be suspect to criticism.

To disagree with Sen. McCain on what he actually says and does is one thing. It's called "principled dissent," which is apparently something that is all but totally lost on the loonbatted, hate-riddled "new left" in America.

But to deliberately manufacture falsehoods about him, then incite hateful, insane comments from a group of folks who have a demonstrated propensity for such lunacy, is completely irresponsible. Especially for someone like Arianna Huffington and her editors, who charge advertisers a small fortune to place their ads on this "heavily-visited" blogsite, and who claim to represent the "enlightened," moral segment of American society.

John McCain has earned the right to a high level of respect and dignity, for all the service he has rendered to America, despite how much some of us may disagree with some of his policies.

John McCain is entitled to a retraction and apology for HuffPost, immediately ---- and to facilitate this, even though I am not a fan of his, I will be emailing this blogthread to him.




Original content is © Copyright 2007 by Jon Quixote. Email to: jonquix@hotmail.com




.